San Jose’s Reid-Hillview Airport to Close—But Not Until 2031

The Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors approved plans to prepare for the closure of Reid-Hillview Airport when federal funds expire in a decade.

During its Tuesday meeting, the board voted 4-1 to move forward with closing the East San Jose airport and begin the long process of community outreach to determine how residents want to rezone the land.

At least 150 community members spoke at the meeting earlier this week and shared their visions for repurposing the airport—affordable housing, social services, educational resources and open space.

Since the airport is obligated to operate until 2031 because of a 2011 Federal Aviation Administration grant, the county has ample time and space to re-envision the nearly 80-year old airfield that sits at 180 acres.

To put its size in perspective, the entirety of San Jose State University’s campus would only make up 47 percent of the plot.

“There will be a tremendous amount of community input as we begin the years-long land-use planning process. This is a long overdue opportunity for residents in East San Jose to voice their aspirations on what the needs are for the 180 acres moving forward, including everything from affordable housing to recreation to schools," Board of Supervisors president Cindy Chavez said.

During the past year, the county had done major community outreach for the Reid-Hillview Vision plan, including leading focus groups, large community workshops, and over a dozen neighborhood presentations.

But Chavez and Supervisor Dave Cortese have had their eye on repurposing the airfield since at least 2018 when they voted to stop taking Federal Aviation Administration grants -- noting that the land could be better utilized to support East San Jose residents.

East San Jose City Council members Magdalena Carrasco, Maya Esparza and Sylvia Arenas said the airport has had a plethora of negative impacts on surrounding communities. They pointed to recent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reports that identified Reid-Hillview as the 25th-highest lead-emitting airport in the country with lead emissions from piston aircraft exceeding safety thresholds set by the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

“The families in this community have, for generations, been put at risk and suffered from the pollution generated by Reid-Hillview," Arenas saidMonday. “Lead is one of the most potent neurotoxins that affect children and today we can say without any question Hillview is putting dangerous levels of lead into the air and children."

In fact, 95122, the ZIP code of the airport and surrounding neighborhoods, is one of the top 200 ZIP codes for lead poisoning among children in the state, according to the California Department of Public Health.

“All these factors have impacted hypertension, obesity, diabetes and it has gotten worse over time,” Gardner Health Services CEO Reymundo Espinoza said. “We have seen higher disparities in the East Side and it’s very important to begin addressing the social determinants of health like housing ... and that begins with repurposing the airport.”

Alum Rock Union School District board member Andres Quintero said repurposing the airport, which grew in 1965 despite community and school district opposition, would “right a historical wrong.”

The district passed a resolution a week prior standing firmly in support of closing the airport because of the lead-related health impacts, but also because of the noise pollution and community fears of plane accidents.

But despite the 100 letters of support from neighborhood groups—one of which had more than 60 signatures from local leaders—not all residents are on the same page.

Jay Botelo, a former Cal Fire engineer, and his wife Tina live a block away from the airport and said they would be disappointed to see it close.

“My 14-year-old son watches the planes launch all the time and he loves it,” Tina Botelo said. “It’s a part of our lives. I used to take him when he was little and every year, they open up the airport for residents to come inside and look at the planes. We love that.”

They also worry that the closures will impact the county’s ability to respond to wildfires and other emergency situations.

“My main thing is the safety of the area right here, the Silicon Valley. I used to work for Cal Fire, and this was one of our main staging areas. When anything happens in Silicon Valley, we have this one,” said Jay Botelo, whose family has lived in East San Jose for decades. “This airport is faster for emergencies, it saves money, it’s safer.”

During the SCU Lightning Complex fires that burned in the county’s east foothills in August, Cal Fire used the airport as a central hub where agencies made attack plans and helicopters refueled.

Supervisor Mike Wasserman, the lone dissenting voice on closure plan, also worried that closing Reid-Hillview would clog San Jose Mineta International Airport.

“Reid-Hillview is a critical reliever airport for San Jose International airport ... that, once gone, can never be replaced. San Jose International has no capacity to expand, yet our region’s population continues to grow,” Wasserman said. “Let’s identify the problems [with Reid-Hillview] and work to fix them.”

The county will also have to deal with a lawsuit by prominent South Bay attorney Jim McManis, who accuses the county of wasting $400,000 in taxpayer money on studies while creating safety hazards by letting the airport deteriorate.

Currently, the airport services private aircrafts and San Jose State University aviation students. It is also used by two emergency response teams: Disaster Airlift Response Team (DART) and the Civil Air Patrol (CAP), who are not first responders and provide support as part of a larger regional network.

Santa Clara County firefighters, San Jose police and other first responders don’t rely on the airport for emergency services and Cal Fire uses it around one to two times a year for wildfire response, county officials said.

Chavez said the decision is largely because of community outcry to close the airport.

“After being ignored for decades, the community was heard tonight,” Chavez said.

The board will tackle the topic again early next year with a report due back on lead levels around the airport and how to mitigate dangers of lead poisoning in the community.

11 Comments

  1. > Alum Rock Union School District board member Andres Quintero said repurposing the airport, which grew in 1965 despite community and school district opposition, would “right a historical wrong.”

    When the airport closes, the community will be subjected to another “historical wrong” of overcrowding, urbanization, and excess emissions of greenhouse gases from people and cars.

  2. So we are now going to build low income housing on land that is poisoned with Lead? In a traffic corridor that already does not have enough access points to get on the freeway? Is the lead study from when we used to use regular gasoline instead of unleaded? I thought planes used the same type of gasoline as cars for small prop planes? The onramps to the freeways already take about 1/2 hour to get on the freeway it will now take over an hour! I think the lead comes from the massive amount of cars driving on Capital expressway not the few planes that land at the airport. BTW Amelia Earhart taught at this airport. I assume we could keep the airport and just put restrictions on the type of plane if the planes are causing the pollution. I do know that if we close the airport then the next fire may burn all of East San Jose since they won’t have a place to set up as a command base and can’t get water drops from the airport.

  3. > I assume we could keep the airport and just put restrictions on the type of plane if the planes are causing the pollution.

    Gee, That would be a simple and rational solution. IF LEAD WERE AN ACTUAL PROBLEM, which I seriously doubt.

    Maybe someday, a real journalist somewhere might do a REAL story to reveal the special interests who are orchestrating the attack on Reid Hillview and general aviation.

  4. The entire picture should be examined with regard to aviation. It is quickly moving to electric (particularly for short distant and regional) and vertical take-off. This eliminates concern about leaded fuel, greatly reduces noise, and most likely means a safer operating environment (e.g. fewer parts, redundancy in motors)

    The question that Supervisors should be asking is how can these trends be incorporated in any new development, as this could create new economic and educational opportunities for the area.

    As an example, Lake Nona, Florida was just announced as the first vertiport in the U.S and has a planned opening of 2025 (autonomous vehicle service provider Beep already provides service to Lake Nona.

    https://www.lakenona.com/articles/taking-flight/

    A more traditional approach from Bye Aerospace is its eFlyer2 which is a full-electric replacement for aging, leaded fuel-based trainers. FAA certification on these electric airplanes is anticipated by late 2021. The fuel and maintenance savings are significant and explain why they have a backlog of over 700 units.

    https://viodi.com/2019/12/06/hello-to-a-new-way-of-flight/

  5. > A more traditional approach from Bye Aerospace is its eFlyer2 which is a full-electric replacement for aging, leaded fuel-based trainers.

    Maybe electric airplanes will replace fuel-based airplanes. Maybe not.

    But the “lead fuel-based airplanes” as a reason for shutting down Reed-Hillview is a fake issue.

  6. “So we are now going to build low income housing on land that is poisoned with Lead?”

    Exactly.

    About as smart as quarantining the oldest, lead-i-est, moldiest, asbesto-i-est properties in San Jose and calling them affordable housing.

    Ms. Arenas proving Socrates right on democracy once again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *