Ground Zero: Rain Brings Little Relief to California’s Depleted Groundwater

The powerful storms that clobbered California for weeks in December and January dropped trillions of gallons of water, flooding many communities and farms. But throughout the state, the rains have done little to nourish the underground supplies that are critical sources of California’s drinking water.

Thousands of people in the San Joaquin Valley have seen their wells go dry after years of prolonged drought and overpumping of aquifers. And a two-week deluge — or even a wet winter — will not bring them relief.

Even in January, as California’s rivers flooded thousands of acres, state officials received reports of more than 30 well outages, adding to more than 5,000 dry residential wells reported statewide in the past decade.

“Just one wet year is nowhere near large enough to refill the amount of groundwater storage that we’ve lost, say, over the last 10 years or more,” said Jeanine Jones, a drought manager with the state Department of Water Resources.

Water from heavy rains can reach shallow groundwater basins in a matter of days, but in places where wells must pump from deep underground aquifers — like those in the San Joaquin Valley — this can take months. And even a season’s worth of storms is not usually enough to restore wells left high and dry by years of overdraft.

Restoring California’s groundwater is not as simple as waiting for rain and letting it seep into the ground. It requires detailed planning and scientific analysis of project sites, and uses tens of millions of dollars in state funds. Land has to be purchased or growers must be compensated for flooding their fields. And it also means that growers — and to a lesser extent, communities — must reduce the water they pump.

Graham Fogg, a UC Davis professor of hydrogeology, said the recent rainfall could substantially help minimally impacted areas, like much of the Sacramento basin, where groundwater tables are only 25 to 30 feet down. But it’s a far different story in the San Joaquin Valley, where the water table is 100 to 300 feet down, even 700 feet in some places.

“That’s where most of the dried-up wells have occurred,” Fogg said, “and that’s where it will take years, maybe decades, of not only managed aquifer recharge, but also reduced pumping from wells, to raise groundwater levels back to more appropriate elevations.”

According to state officials and other groundwater experts, most wells in the San Joaquin Valley have virtually no chance of recovering unless groundwater pumping is drastically curbed.

“I’ve seen about 2,000 wells go dry, and we don’t see wells recover on their own,” said Tami McVay, director of emergency services for Self-Help Enterprises, a San Joaquin Valley nonprofit that provides funding to residents who need new wells. “They sometimes recover for a couple of days, but then they go dry again.”

Groundwater is liquid gold

Groundwater is among California’s most precious natural resources, providing about 40% of the water consumed in most years. It is an inexpensive, local source in a state where many cities rely on imported water and rural towns have no other sources. And its importance is magnified in dry years, when reservoirs fed by rivers are depleted.

The San Joaquin Valley’s groundwater reserves have been relentlessly pumped by farmers for decades. Tens of millions of acre-feet have been pumped from the ground, causing the water table to steadily drop and thousands of wells to go dry.

A handful of communities, largely home to low-income Latino residents, have run out of water, forcing people to use bottled water for everything. The true scope of the problem, in fact, may be underestimated, since many dewatered wells are unreported.

East Porterville, Tooleville, Tombstone Territory, Fairmead, Lanare and Riverdale are just a few of the San Joaquin Valley communities that have been hit hard with dry wells.

“There’s so much political pressure to maintain the status quo, and to continue pumping, because it’s tied up with economic profits. And the end result is community members who can’t rely on their wells for safe water,” said Tien Tran, a policy advocate with the group Community Water Center, which advocates for water equity.

Almost a decade ago, California enacted a law that is supposed to protect groundwater reserves from overpumping. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act requires local groundwater agencies to halt long-term depletion and achieve sustainability, defined by specific criteria. But the deadlines are almost 20 years away, and basins are still being overdrafted.

The San Joaquin Valley’s major groundwater basins are designated critically overdrafted by the California Department of Water Resources. A year ago, the agency rejected the region’s groundwater sustainability plans on the grounds that they inadequately considered the needs of residential wells, among other impacts.

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s water strategy released last August called for increasing groundwater recharge by an average of half a million acre-feet each year. On Jan. 13, state water agencies announced a program to expedite approval of recharge projects.

Department of Water Resources Director Karla Nemeth said the voluminous mountain snowpack dumped in January offers a prime opportunity, and a time-sensitive one, to recharge aquifers.

“We’ve got a heck of a lot of snow in the Central Sierra,” she said. “That snow is going to melt, and we want the local water districts to be positioned to capture some of that excess snowmelt and get it underground.”

The quest to store rainwater underground

Compelled in part by state law, and often supported by millions in state funds, some farmers and other land managers have dug large recharge basins to capture stormwater and allow it to sink. Cities design similar projects, and in recent months alone, they’ve put tens of thousands of acre-feet of water into underground storage.

While not enough on their own to reverse overdraft, these programs could serve as models for scaling up recharge efforts statewide.

In the Tulare Irrigation District, for instance, stormwater during high flows is diverted into 1,300 acres of ponds used to recharge groundwater. In addition, in a new program launched last year, farmers who sink water into their fields during storms can get it back later, during dry periods. General Manager Aaron Fukuda said it has motivated dozens of landowners to take part this winter. As of Feb. 3, the district was bringing in water at a rate of 1,500 acre-feet daily, mostly to be deposited in the ground.

“The actions our district took last year are paying dividends this year,” Fukuda said.

About 40 miles to the north, the Fresno Irrigation District has captured at least 9,000 acre-feet of water since December, according to Kassy Chauhan, executive director of the North Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency, which manages the district’s groundwater.

Much of this water was diverted into some 900 acres of basins, including 180 acres that were recently constructed. The Fresno district spent millions buying former farmland and forming these basins, which are basically bulldozed depressions ringed by earthen berms made for the express purpose of depositing water underground.

“We were able to capture that water in those basins,” Chauhan said. “It was clear progress.”Another example of a recharge project is the Pajaro River Valley, on the Central Coast. The local water agency has collaborated with researchers to identify potential recharge hotspots and carve out infiltration basins. One has been in operation for 20 years, and more are coming. The goal, said Brian Lockwood, general manager of the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency, is to enroll farmers in a rebate program that  pays them for flooding their land.

But these types of efforts, even applied broadly, will only have a limited impact. Managed aquifer recharge using local water could potentially recover just 3% to 8% of the San Joaquin Valley’s groundwater overdraft, according to 2020 research.

UC Davis Professor of civil and environmental engineering Jay Lund said, while he endorses groundwater recharge projects, there is a better way to lessen the Central Valley’s water woes.

“We have to reduce demand,” he said.

The problem is that farmers are still pumping water out of the ground faster than it’s going back in.

Experts have predicted that the state groundwater law could eventually force as many as 750,000 acres of farmland out of production, permanently easing demands on the state’s water supply.

Groundwater agencies tend to “emphasize solutions on the supply side, and relatively little on the demand side … and the supply numbers do not add up,” according to a 2020 PPIC analysis.

In much of the Tulare Irrigation District, the groundwater table sits at a record low elevation of 180 feet underground, and Fukuda said the district’s sustainability plan — required by the state’s groundwater law and developed by the Mid-Kaweah Groundwater Sustainability Agency — allows for the water table to dip a bit farther before leveling off. The North Kings agency, according to Chauhan, is also allowing some continued decline.

According to data from more than 1,200 San Joaquin Valley monitoring wells, the water table has been dropping for at least two decades, in many places more than 2.5 feet per year on average.

The groundwater plans that the state rejected last year were revised and resubmitted in July, and the state is expected to announce their next round of San Joaquin Valley assessments within two months.

Water equity activists who have studied the revised plans say they’re not impressed by the changes made.

“We still found that these plans are not taking adequate steps to protect drinking water users in the basins,” said Nataly Escobeda Garcia, policy coordinator for Water Programs with the NGO Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability. “We anticipate that numerous domestic wells and public water systems will still be at risk of dewatering.”

The Community Water Center has predicted that almost 500 domestic wells that draw from the Kaweah Subbasin, in the southeast San Joaquin Valley, could go dry under the new plans.

“Domestic wells are disproportionately impacted,” Tran said. Tulare County alone has seen 1,810 wells go dry since 2014, according to the state reporting system. All but two were labeled “household.”

Replenishing groundwater has limits

With or without human intervention, water sinks into the Earth. Natural, or passive, recharge is the process by which hundreds of millions of acre-feet of water have accumulated in California’s shallow basins and deep aquifers. Recent research from NASA found that as much as 4 million acre-feet yearly may seep beneath the Central Valley.

But this doesn’t necessarily make a big difference. While the water can generate quick spurts of rebound of the water table, these post-rain gains — at least in the San Joaquin Valley — tend to be erased, plus some, by subsequent dry spells and continued pumping.

The result is a one-step-up-two-steps-down trajectory of groundwater decline.

“Overall water levels have been dropping and until it’s reversed, we’re going to keep getting dry wells,” Fogg said.

Even extremely wet periods have had only temporary benefits in the San Joaquin Valley. After the record wet 2017 winter, the water table jumped — in some places dramatically — but quickly dropped again, continuing the decline. Today more than half of the monitoring wells in Tulare County are at all-time low water levels.

Active recharge programs generated about 6.5 million acre-feet in the San Joaquin Valley alone in 2017, according to a report by the Public Policy Institute of California.

“We have lots of active recharge already,” said Ellen Hanak, vice-president and director of the institute’s Water Policy Center. “The question is, with (the groundwater law), can we up our game?”

Paul Gosselin, the Department of Water Resources’ deputy director of sustainable groundwater management, said 42 recharge projects underway with $68 million in state support could add 117,000 acre-feet of water storage to the state’s aquifers — a big step toward meeting the governor’s half-million acre-foot goal. He said the department has $250 million available to support more recharge work.

Changing climate makes this work all the more urgent. The state’s system of capturing and storing water in reservoirs was designed in part around snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. But as the climate warms, mountain snowpack is becoming scarcer. It is melting faster and earlier, and more precipitation is falling as rain in the first place.

California’s existing reservoirs don’t have the capacity to store so much liquid water at once, but its aquifers do.

“Groundwater recharge will be a good way to compensate for that change,” Hanak said. But, she said, “there is a major time constraint — you’ve got to be able to get that water out there fast, because it’s coming down fast.”

Randy Fiorini, a Merced County farmer and former chair of the Delta Stewardship Council, thinks the slow pace of aquifer percolation is an obstacle that can only be addressed by building small holding reservoirs to capture stormwater.

“From there, you would meter it into a groundwater basin,” he said.

Urban success stories

In urban areas, maintaining groundwater is easier than in farm communities. But it takes active management.

The Orange County Water District provides water for the 2.5 million people who live in the northern half of the county. Despite minimal rainfall, it has relatively little reliance on imported supplies and uses a unique groundwater storage system.

A third of its water comes from the Santa Ana River, which originates in the San Bernardino Mountains and flows through San Bernardino and Riverside counties. The Inland Empire discharges voluminous amounts of treated wastewater into the river as it flows into Orange County, where it is deposited into ponds that recharge the aquifer, according to Roy Herndon, the district’s chief hydrogeologist.

Another third comes from natural rainfall plus imported Colorado River water. The rest is wastewater that is used to refill the aquifer after undergoing treatment so advanced that it meets or exceeds all drinking water standards, making it “essentially potable,” Herndon said. Built 15 years ago, the plant can produce 130 million gallons per day, enough water for about 400,000 households.

All told, the Orange County Water District has 1,100 acres of recharge basins which collectively absorb an average of 250,000 acre-feet of stormwater and runoff annually.

In Sonoma County, the local water agency is using a $6.9 million state grant to inject surplus water from the Russian River hundreds of feet underground. The project could enter its initial pilot phase next winter and eventually produce 500 acre-feet of water each year. If successful, other similar projects could follow, he said.

In 2018, Los Angeles County voters passed Measure W, which created a new tax on the owners of impermeable surfaces that direct water into storm drains leading to the ocean. Each year since its introduction, the tax has generated about $280 million in funds for use in supporting stormwater projects.

Since October, the county has captured more than 143,000 acre feet of stormwater in reservoirs and groundwater basins, according to Lisette Guzman, a public information officer with Los Angeles County Public Works. That’s enough water, she said, to support more than a million residents for a year.

Lund says the physical limitations of moving and handling surface water mean groundwater recharge projects cannot fix most of the state’s well problems.

“No matter how much (recharge) you do, you aren’t going to get more than 15% of the groundwater overdraft in the San Joaquin Valley,” Lund said. “That’s good, and you should do as much as you can economically, but you still have 80, 90% of the problem left.”

Gosselin, at the state water agency, is more optimistic, citing the new research, laws, funding and priorities in managing groundwater.

In the novel “East of Eden,” John Steinbeck described Californians’ tendency to forget about wet times when it’s dry and drought when it rained. But Gosselin said growers and water agencies are now planning ahead, rain or shine, to capture and store water in the ground.

“We need resiliency from climate change,” he said, “…and I don’t think people are going to forget about either right now,” he said.

State water restrictions are in effect through December:

  • Outdoor watering that lets water run onto sidewalks and other areas (except incidental runoff)
  • Washing vehicles without an automatic shutoff nozzle
  • Washing hard surfaces like driveways or sidewalks that don’t absorb water
  • Street cleaning or construction site preparation
  • Filling decorative fountains, lakes, or ponds without a recirculation pump
  • Outdoor watering within 48 hours after at least 1/4 inch of rainfall
  • Watering decorative grass on public medians

Alastair Bland is a reporter with CalMatters.


  1. Perhaps the State should not be flushing so much of the runoff into the ocean?
    They have allowed the wildlife refuges to dry up and refused to flood others, despite the need of wildlife, and now they blame it all on pumping? If I understood the Merced Irrigation District speaker correctly from a few weeks ago, 98% of all runoff goes to the ocean.
    Poor leadership, poor management….. that’s the real problem.

  2. Just an Observation,

    Remember most of the land in CA is FEDERALLY managed, so the state has VERY little power over it.

    And also, the other real issue is that very soon we will be back to the dry atmospheric conditions which will EVAPORATE the recent additions to the water resurces. Currently lake mead is at 1047 when in 2022 ot was 1067 and in 2021 it was at 1087. We are at peak volume right now.

    We typically lose as much as 3-4% of water levels during the year which means by July we will be at 1020 levels in Lake Mead. If it reaches 950 feet it will DEAD POOL. With only 70 feet difference if we conserve water we will barely get by. But if the weather does what is expected it will warm up significantly and be much drier in the next 6 months.

    When you have variables out of your control, like CLIMATE SHIFT, it means the government has no choice but to adjust. Too many people BELEIVE you can magically have more water. That is a massive delusion.

    And also, any “farming irrigation” that loses water is equally to blame, that is the majority of the farms in the state. But no one wants to tell the FARMERS to get their acts together. Because they want the taxpayers to pay for it.

    Face it people, we are FAR from risk regarding water shortages.

  3. Although campaign consultants like to see politicians at ribbon cuttings for shiny tall structures, the most important things that governments are unseen and/or preventive. Groundwater replenishment is certainly in that category! Thank you for the article.

  4. Just an Observation,

    From what I understand a Dam will not replenish ground water, Not unless it is designed to do it. But most dams in CA are electric generating dams and they also are aqueduct feeders. The only way to replenish ground water is with MORE RAIN, or pumping water in from another source. Yuo can REUSE sewage to this, but it needs to be treated. I think you can also pump in sea water, but it also will require a lot of treatment, I just learned that from this article (

    So the real issue is finding a unrestricted resource of water, the ocean appears to be the only one for us.

  5. Capture runoff before it goes to the ocean, but it needs to be captured in the right places, i.e. the central valley that was historically marsh land.

  6. Just an Observation,

    As I said, RAIN is a VERY LIMITED resource now. IT IS UNRELIABLE.

    Why can’t you understand it. We nee a supply we can capture that will not run out, That ony resource is the PACIFIC OCEAN.

    But if you think you can hope for rain to finally replenish what we are losing go ahead.

    By the way you should watch the show “THE END IS NYE” with Bill Nye, he is discussing the exact problem we are having in CA, and as he demonstrates in the episode “MIDNIGHT AT NOON” we are repeating the same problems that caused the Dust Bowl.

    But you can go ahead and watch the train wreck.

  7. Jerry K., indeed that would help, and the state has introduced management, if not replenishment, of the ground water assets the state has.

    Nuclear desalination such as described in the report about using Diablo Canyon for this, would work, producing 4 1/2 times the water the Delta bypass sought since the start of the State Water Project might provide, of Sacramento River water to places south of the Delta, but so many in the state are incompetent and phobic to hysterical (routinely irrational) about anything and everything nuclear.

    Runoff collection, like rainwater capture in other places, can face opposition by environmentalists when taken to a larger scale. The North Coast rivers, where most of the state’s water is, is largely off limits at this time, and most water use in the state remains as usual, environmental, followed by ag, then by urban (settlements, residential-commercial-industrial uses). Sending North Coast water from new reservoirs to the rest of the system could be done but would be expensive. (What price life, later?)

    The carried-to-the-end understanding of warming from fossil fuel combustion and related phenomena was established and well-known by the late 1970s, early 1980s, including the aridification (drying) of California and the rest of the Southwest inland of it, as well as other parts of the West, and it’s merely a matter largely of refinement and introducing this or that additional element since then, but there’s no end to the alarmist, misleading, irrational, and sick behavior among climate movement adherents. (Quasi-religious and at times cultist, when more moved) We who know better have no need for climate celebrities any more than eco-barons who keep proving P.T. Barnum correct and make a living of sorts at it, nor for the political infiltration into academia as well as the media and government (as happens with other political trends), substituting for the real. The state has time to prepare for worse and should prepare for the worse, a reduction of water supply. The Colorado River system and its users faces a harsher challenge. Note that So-Cal depends on Colorado River water and if losing it, will need more water from the north.

  8. Just an Observation,

    Why is it that I remember that Lake Tahoe is drying up, that means the NorCal water system is equally disrupted. ( Newsweek article “Drought Is Killing the Trees at Lake Tahoe”

    By the way, there is a problem with using Diablo Nuclear Reactor, it is VERY old, and it is not up to compliance with the NRC, which is actually a very PRO Nuclear Agency. The report is found here ( “Despite a grace period for Diablo Canyon nuclear plant, federal regulators say no to resuming review of PG&E’s extension request.”

    “PG&E HAD HOPED TO RESUME THE LICENSE APPLICATION it started in 2009 and withdrew in 2018, when it told the NRC that Diablo wasn’t needed “to meet California’s projected energy demand requirement” but cried poor in other circles. Though the utility said it could provide the safety and environmental documents by the end of 2023, the NRC staff observed the data was required with the license application now.”

    So it would seem it is not feasible to operate Diablo Canyon for this purpose. Someone here is not being up to date regarding whether that rector can safely operate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *