City of San Jose Plans to Double Electric Car Charging Stations with $14 Million Investment

As San Jose strives to meet its environmental goals, city officials announced today that they would be receiving $14 million to install more electric vehicle charging stations.

The biggest chunk of the investment—$10 million—will come from the California Energy Commission. And the remaining $4 million, which was approved unanimously by the City Council Tuesday afternoon, would be allocated from San Jose Clean Energy.

City officials expect the cash windfall to finance approximately 100 new Direct Current Fast Charging stations, which can charge a vehicle to 80 percent in 20 to 30 minutes, and 1,400 Level 2 charging stations, which provide 20 to 40 miles of charge per hour.

“This is not a strategy for more Teslas,” San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo said at a press conference. “Twenty-five percent of these dollars will be targeted in low income communities trying to insure that everyone can benefit from the green dividend, particularly given what we know about auto emissions and clean air and the necessity of improving the quality of our air in many of our struggling communities.”

In February of 2018, San Jose approved its Climate Smart plan to help reduce the amount of greenhouse gases the city produces. Part of the initiative involves getting gas-guzzling cars off the road and replacing them with cleaner electric vehicles. San Jose officials say they hope that by 2030, 61 percent of passenger vehicles citywide—or 153,200 cars—are electric. As of October last year, California’s Department of Motor Vehicles said that San Jose had only 23,170 registered electric cars.

A slew of elected officials, including state Sen. Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont) and Assembly members Kansen Chu (D-San Jose) and Ash Kalra (D-San Jose), voiced their support for the investment at a press conference before today’s council meeting.

“As a member of the assembly transportation committee, we have voted on bills to offer incentives to the people to buy a second hand electric vehicle,” Chu said. “I’m really delighted to know that 25 percent of the money is spent on installing the electric vehicle charger[s] in the low income [areas], the East Side or closer to my ’hood. I think it will definitely encourage more people to really be part of this new era.”

The $10 million investment from the state is part of a larger program called the California Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Project (CALeVIP). Santa Clara and San Mateo counties also expect to get up to $60 million to build electric vehicle charging stations.

Under the program, the charging stations can be in public or private places, but are not currently available for single-family homes. The incentive will cover a part of the cost of the charging station and any upgrades that need to be made to the electrical infrastructure in order to install them.

With $14 million from the state and San Jose Clean Energy, the city will offer two different incentives: one for “superchargers,” also called Direct Current Fast Chargers, and the other for Level 2 chargers. (Source: City of San Jose)

San Jose Clean Energy is in the process of negotiating another incentive for new affordable housing projects. At the Tuesday hearing, Councilman Johnny Khamis asked to utilize the CALeVIP funds for charging stations in new multi-family homes that are subject to the city’s new reach codes.

(Source: City of San Jose)

Last month, San Jose approved new regulations that require developers to opt for electrical appliances in a move to help curb greenhouse gas emissions. To attract builders and spur housing production, Khamis wants to use the CALeVIP funds to finance charging stations in new green homes.

But Lori Mitchell, the director of San Jose Clean Energy, said new construction won’t be eligible under the program.

“I thought that this could actually help us with our reach codes because we created reach codes that are going to drive up the cost of construct[ion],” Khamis said. “I am a little concerned that we’re putting hurdles in the way of doing construction and we’re not giving people a hand up.”

East Side Councilwoman Magdalena Carrasco said she was especially pleased that 25 percent of the money was pegged for lower income communities. She said she recently bought a hybrid van, and while it’s easy for her to find a place to plug in near Santana Row, she said she struggles to find a place to charge it in her own neighborhood. “My residents may be lower income than some other areas ... but we drive,” she said.

Grace Hase is a staff writer for San Jose Inside and Metro Silicon Valley. Email tips to [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter at @grace_hase.

8 Comments

  1. This is great news and a step in the right direction for SJ to meet its climate goals. One observation is that the parking log at James Lick high school, directly on the corner of Alum Rock and White Roads, would be a perfect spot for a set of charging stations. The site already has solar panels and chargers would be a nice addition to the location.

    • > This is great news and a step in the right direction for SJ to meet its climate goals.

      Why not just change the “climate goals” and declare that we’ve already met them?

      The “climate goals” are stupid and arbitrary anyway.

      And, the “climate goals” are ultimately based on academic fraud.

      Chief Climate Quack Michael “Hockey Stick” Mann got his butt kicked in a Canadian court over his deceit and distortion:

      https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/08/22/breaking-dr-tim-ball-wins-michaelemann-lawsuit-mann-has-to-pay/

      “UPDATE – Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann “hides the decline” AGAIN”

      It’s over, SCCrezzy. The climate has been saved. We have met our climate goals. We’ve proven in a court of law that the tax funded climate quacks are fraudsters and scammers. Now, we just need to get our tax dollars back from the crooks.

  2. This is a stupid waste of money and virtue signaling to the max. When will people wake up to the idiocy of electric vehicles? This entire state needs a change in leadership ASAP.

  3. If only the City Council would take solving the homeless and crime problems as serious as they take this nonsense. The things that SJ citizens really care about.

  4. They should use the already installed charging stations that sit idle at our schools and in our communities, unused too often. That could save about 50K per unit. What a scam to take more of our money. Us poor people don’t drive these cars! Why put the stations in low econonmic areas – to tease them? WTF – CA needs new leaders ASAP – Brian W

  5. > And the remaining $4 million, which was approved unanimously by the City Council Tuesday afternoon, . . .

    Well, waddiya know!

    $4 million bucks just laying around.

    Lets spend it on charging stations for Silicon Valley tech geeks who drive Tesla’s and work in Mountain View and don’t pay taxes in San Jose, but consume San Jose housing and services.

    How many virtue signaling points for voting to spend white working class bucks (and white privilege coupons for minorities) on Al Gore’s bogus narrative?

  6. Welfare for the rich.

    Just add this to the list of bike lanes, open space, UGB, CEQA, outragous sales taxes, and on and on…

Leave a Reply