Federal Infrastructure Bill Will Expand Bay Area EV Charging Network

It doesn’t require a keen eye to notice the hundreds of ChargePoint, Electrify America and Tesla Supercharger electric vehicle charging ports (typically) glowing along major intersections in the South Bay.

The city of San Jose alone has installed 53 EV charging stations in public parking garages downtown and near Westfield Mall and Santana Row, while just shy of 1,000 other ports are scattered across the sprawling city. Santa Clara has 330, Cupertino tallies 173 and Mountain View claims 156. This isn’t a fluke.

Partially thanks to a 2018 initiative from Gov. Jerry Brown, California is currently home to nearly 23,000 charging stations—one third of the nation’s supply, according to a Pew Trust study—and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District reports 9,481 public charging ports within its nine-county region.

Yet, feelings of “range anxiety” still shadow residents of this EV heaven, primarily when traveling through more rural areas. Even trekking from Sacramento to San Diego is tricky without carefully planned stops, especially for non-Tesla vehicles. Driving an EV to fishing trips in Minnesota’s boundary waters or music festivals beyond the rolling hills of Tennessee seems ludicrous.

Despite being enticed by the ways electric vehicles help curb emissions connected to climate change, Kira White said she probably wouldn’t take one to visit her family three hours north in Chico. Meredith Liu says she is planning on using her husband's gas-powered vehicle if she ever needs to commute further than her daily journey from Gilroy to Mountain View; she primarily decided to join the nearly 1.2 million electronic vehicle owners on U.S. roads to save on fuel and access the fast lane, after all.

The $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act President Joe Biden signed into law Nov. 15—the largest long-term investment of its kind in nearly a century—may convince buyers who have been on the fence.

Alongside investments in projects like replacing lead water pipes, laying cables for broadband internet and expanding public transit like Amtrak trains and city buses, Biden announced a goal of increasing the nation’s roughly 50,000 public EV charging stations to half a million by 2030. California expects to receive $384 million over five years to expand its charging network.

Some argue the lofty goal of crafting a ubiquitous network may be more hopeful than realistic, but the effort would attempt to solve one of the biggest reasons 1 in 5 EV drivers switch back to gas.

This investment in EVs may also have ripple effects locally, as more companies are jumping into the Bay Area’s electric mobility industry. Joining Tesla’s (now former) Palo Alto headquarters and Fremont factory operations, more than 200 EV companies are sprinkled around the peninsula, including Nio, QuantumScape, ChargePoint, Boson Motors, Amply Power and Tropos Technologies in Santa Clara County.

Mohamed Badawy, an assistant professor of electrical engineering at San Jose State University and founder of the school’s Center of Power Electronic Converters, sees Silicon Valley as the next Detroit, exporting electric vehicles and technologies until the industry becomes more accessible for all consumers. And while he says it was clear to him 10 years ago that electric mobility systems were the future, the country’s electronic grids, transit manufacturers and government programs are still far behind on supporting the growing need for EVs.

“It's not going to change things a lot on the scale, but it is a step in the right direction overall for the whole nation,” Badawy says. “Even in California, which is the most advanced state in terms of EV charging, we're still far away from where we should be. Companies are not going to build charging stations if they don't see that there's enough demand for them. And the demands cannot come only from one company, which is still on the high end and not for everyday Americans.”

Cost has majorly excluded people who can’t afford these vehicles from the industry, particularly college students and budding professionals like Amelia Hain—who is one of the young adults arguably with the most years left to drive. Her boyfriend, Kole Barr, has his money on hydrogen fuel cells to combat the “lesser than two evils” debate between gas and lithium ion batteries.

Even buyers who are able to purchase new EVs are primarily concerned about the tax rebates earned from their investments and generally agree Teslas are unreasonably priced and brand name-driven. That leaves people like Shuo Yang worried his 2021 Audi e-tron will get aged out of the evolving EV market, just like compatible ports on Apple products. Some 2018 cars have already been relegated to the lowest, slowest power levels.

But cheaper solutions will likely have to be utilized to make widespread changes, since the $7.2 billion is nearly half Biden’s original hopes for a $15 billion budget.

Many of the new chargers are expected to have a “Level 2” capacity, meaning an hours-long charge will replenish around 25 miles of battery power. Many EVs can drive more than 300 miles on a fully charged battery, which takes around 8 hours. That’s comparable to a standard 10-gallon gasoline tank in a mid-priced internal combustion car, which usually takes less than five minutes to fill.

These 240-volt contraptions—the same electricity needed to power washing machines—cost around $2,000, while their faster companions are 50 to 100 times more expensive, racking up anywhere from $40,000 to $400,000. PG&E reported their average cost for installing Level 2 ports through 2020 was $18,384.

No matter where drivers charge their electric cars, they’ll have to continue “sipping” power whenever they are at public destinations like multi-family residences, grocery stores, parks, hotels and even churches, as well as standard gas stations. Some EV advocates are even arguing that investments in 120-volt “Level 1” chargers will avoid even decades-old infrastructure to handle the power supply needed.

In the meantime, EV drivers like Maria Garfias will be satisfied with the cost savings and eco-friendly benefits of their personal transportation. That is, if she can reliably find working charging stations, unlike one pesky machine at Westfield Mall.

“I do wish they were as frequent as gas stations,” Garfias said, before driving away in her Mustang Mach-E—60 miles left until its battery died.

7 Comments

  1. OK, let’s stop saying that electric cars are zero emission. They are not. Just calculate the environmental impact to building the cars and the electricity that needs to be produced to put into the cars. There is a loss of power between the transmission of energy and the delivery location. There is also a loss of energy between the charging station and the car. When the cars have reached the end of their economic life, there will be a substantial environmental impact to disposing of the batteries.

    Much of the energy that goes into the electric vehicle grid comes from coal and natural gas. One more thing that is obvious, but often overlooked in the Pollyannaish discussions about EVs, is that the electric grid will require massive upgrades to even come close to handling the projected (Leftist wet dream) use of EVs by the general public.

  2. Looks like a lot of pigs are swilling at the public trough.

    Although, according to Brandon, it cost us ZERO dollars. I’d blame the morons who elected him, but most of them have been dead for years.

  3. Fast charging doesn’t really help with range anxiety. More plentiful charging might, and is a necessity before people might switch in amounts that begin to make EVs closer to mainstream. It’s just a niche now. That charging also must be high-power, not overnight, for vehicles on the road or parked for short periods, and one cannot expect to charge at home or at work, especially with new apartments featuring much less than enough parking, or no parking. And what about on the streets? Lamppost chargers are not a serious proposal. City and county lots are being sought for conversion to housing now, too bad for higher-power AC, which would be helpful and cheaper than the expensive high-power DC, but nobody wants a bigger AC charger in their vehicle, as a rule.. That’s in addition to EVs having to have much more stored energy while being much cheaper to buy. More charging is good, the wrong charging bad for EVs.

  4. This is awesome. We’ll have everything except generation to provide electrical power to the new outlets.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *