Santa Clara County Expands Support for Choking Victims in Domestic Violence Cases

Santa Clara County is expanding a pilot program that offers free forensic exams, care and advocacy to victims who have been choked by their intimate partners.

On Tuesday, the five-member Board of Supervisors unanimously approved expanding testing, which was only available to adults and minors in in certain parts of the county, to the rest of the South Bay and to children in child abuse cases.

The reason for such testing: because it helps victims prove their case in court and prevent their perpetrators from continuing the abuse and potentially killing them, explained Carla Collins, who leads the county's Office of Gender-Based Violence Prevention.

“It’s important for everyone to understand this, so that the patient gets the medical care and additional supports needed to heal and to be safe,” she said.

Some of that support is found in a courtroom, through convictions.

In cases where medical forensic exams were conducted, the criminal case supported the filing of more serious felony charges over misdemeanors 86.6 percent of the time during the pilot program. In comparison, the felony rate for cases of intimate partner violence was 28.8 percent in 2019, before the county started its testing program, according to a recent report by the Office of Gender-Based Violence Prevention.

There were also higher prosecution rates, “which means that the violent perpetrator was removed, preventing continued abuses and possibly preventing homicide,” Collins said.

Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said the medical exams were the reason his office won a jury trial in a domestic violence case last November despite the victim declining to testify at trial.

“The medical evidence was the crucial witness to what he had done to her,” he said. “[It was] the key to helping the jury find the defendant guilty of all the crimes.”

The victim in that case was one of the 30 women who participated in the county’s pilot program for free medical forensic testing for non-fatal strangulation victims.

The Santa Clara Police Department was the responding agency that took the victim to Santa Clara Valley Medical Center for the exam.

The pilot, launched in January 2020, allocated $5 million to provide testing for 150 adolescent and adult victims of domestic abuse.

The state provides funding to test victims of sexual assault but not victims of choking, Collins said, which is why the county took the initiative to create its own free testing.

A drawback of the program, however, is that only 20 percent of the 150 women who were offered testing chose to participate.

Ingrid Infante, a domestic violence advocate with Community Solutions—a nonprofit that supports victims of sexual abuse, domestic violence and many other crises—said their disinclination to take part in the tests likely stems from police not encouraging it and victims not understanding the benefits.

During the Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday, Collins suggested that law enforcement instead direct victims who qualify for testing to service providers regardless of whether the victim wants an exam done at the time.

“Advocates are trained to screen for strangulation and explain its consequences to victims,” Infante said. “We explain the dangers of strangulation, educate the victim on why the exam is so important ... and the victim may change his or her mind.”

In fact, Community Solutions referred six women who reported being choked to a medical forensic examination—a 100 percent referral rate. One survivor who had initially declined to an examination later changed her mind as well.

At their Tuesday meeting, the board also approved that the county and the District Attorney’s Office partner with the San Diego-based Training Institute on Strangulation Prevention to request an assessment of the county’s response and prevention system and get advice on how to improve it.

The findings from the partnership will come back to the board on May 4.


  1. what is with the picture?


    so in the past if someone came in and said their wife choked them, then they wouldn’t test him or collect evidence?

    what kind of police work is that?

  2. “The medical evidence was the crucial witness to what he had done to her,” — Jeff Rosen

    If our esteemed county prosecutor believes that medical evidence of choking is crucial to its proof, then I’m sure this great defender of justice will offer his expertise to the jury in the Derek Chauvin case, where the medical examination revealed no such evidence.

  3. I am glad that the dangers of strangulation are being explained to people. Some people might not know and they just let it happen. Other people might be thinking that it isn’t as abusive as other problems and that they shouldn’t come forward with it. Either way, people need to know about it so that fewer people get hurt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *