Dems Voice Concern Over Rule Excluding Voters From Primary

With the Democratic primary fast approaching, some party members are concerned that a state rule will potentially prevent tens of thousands of independent absentee voters from participating in the party’s presidential candidate nomination this March.

Here’s the situation: if you are not registered with a political party, or you are registered with a handful of small ones, and you vote by mail, you need to request a new ballot or re-register in order to vote for one of the Democratic presidential candidates. (If you vote in person but are registered as a no-party preference, then you can request a primary ballot at the polling place.)

In most elections, Californians vote for the top two candidates of any party, so registration doesn’t really matter. The same rule doesn’t hold in presidential campaigns.

Last month, registrars in each county sent out postcards to impacted voters offering them a chance to change their registration. The numbers aren’t great.

The deadline to return the letters has passed, but voters can still register with a different party or request a ballot with primary candidates directly from their county’s registrar.

However, given recent surges in the number of nonpartisan voters—and longtime increases in absentee voters—the policy could impact many voters who are not aware of the problem, according to polls.

“Voters that can’t overcome this procedural hurdle—and there may be as many as 600,000 of them, based on an analysis of 2016 data—won’t be able to vote for a presidential candidate. That’s enough votes to decide who will be the Democratic nominee,” Jessica Levinson, a Loyola Law School professor, and Paul Mitchell, a political commentator, wrote in a Jan. 2 Los Angeles Times opinion piece.

A Growing Category

In California, where Democrats hold the vast majority of elected offices, there are more no-party preference voters than there are Republicans.

In Santa Clara County, roughly a third of 940,000 registered voters have no party preference—the highest concentration of no-party-preference voters in the state. In San Mateo County, 29 percent are nonpartisan. In Santa Cruz County, 26 percent have no party preference, according to numbers from the California Secretary of State.

Pair that with the fact that vote-by-mail, also known as absentee voting, has grown in popularity steadily over the past 50 years.

In the 1966 primary, only 1.89 percent of California voters voted by mail. The rate increased significantly starting in the 1990s. In the 2016 primary, 58.92 percent of registered voters in California voted by mail.

A 2016 study by Capitol Weekly found that many people in the affected category intended to vote, but did not know about the problem.

“The study found that 88 percent of these [no party preference, vote-by-mail] voters are interested in voting in the upcoming [2016] election. Of those voters, two-thirds are interested in voting in the Democratic primary, while more than 17 percent are planning on re-registering to vote Republican,” Capitol Weekly reported at the time.

Between 2008 and 2016, the number of absentee, nonpartisan voters nearly tripled, from roughly 700,000 to 2 million, according to Capitol Weekly.

State law required each county to send a letter to every no-party preference, absentee voter in their county. In order to receive a ballot with the Democratic Primary candidates on them, voters had to fill out and return the letter; however, based on the return rates, it seems that many voters will be surprised they cannot vote in the primary election.

The Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters sent out 300,000 letters. As of last week, they’d received 31,555 back—a 10 percent rate of return. Surrounding counties have seen similarly small response rates.

The deadline to switch party registration is Feb. 18.

According to data from the Secretary of State’s Office, the number of registered Democrats increased from 7.4 million to 8.9 million, a bump in membership of 1.5 million. The number of nonpartisan voters increased from 4.1 million to 5.4 million—a 1.3 million increase. Meanwhile, the number of registered Republicans remained flat at around 4.7 million.

Early Bird

That’s not the only significant change to the California primary this time around. In 2017, then-Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law to move California’s primary to March 3, 2020. In election phraseology, March 3 is a Super Tuesday, when voters in over a dozen states will cast ballots. Historically, voters in the Golden State would vote in June. But in 2016, the Democratic primary was pretty much done by June.

Recent polling shows that the top three candidates are fairly close together. A poll from the Public Policy Institute of California, released on Jan. 13, put US Sen. Bernie Sanders ahead of the pack with 27 percent of likely voters. Former Vice President Joe Biden received 24 percent. US Sen. Elizabeth Warren got 23 percent.

In 2016, Santa Clara County was split 57 percent to 43 percent between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primaries.

San Mateo County favored Clinton over Sanders 58 percent to 41 percent; Santa Cruz County gave Sanders 59 percent of the vote compared to Clinton’s 40 percent; and San Benito County chose Clinton in a 54 percent to 44 percent vote.

Jennifer Wadsworth also contributed to this report. 

6 Comments

  1. that the state institutionalizes this prohibition should be unconstitutional. if a party wants to restrict ceryain voters, so be it, choose your own candidates. but dont use the state to enfore your discrimination

  2. > In the 1966 primary, only 1.89 percent of California voters voted by mail. The rate increased significantly starting in the 1990s. In the 2016 primary, 58.92 percent of registered voters in California voted by mail.

    Voters aren’t “choosing” to vote by mail.

    The “Voter’s Choice Act” MANDATES that future elections will be “vote-by-mail” elections.

    Oh, sure. You can receive your ballot in the mail and take it to a “vote collection station”, but it is NOT a “polling place” There are no election judges.

    California elections are now one hundred percent “Vote by mail” elections.

    By the way, wherever a voter chooses to complete his or her ballot is designated a “polling place” under law, and no one is allowed to campaign near a polling place OR help a voter to vote their ballot.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  3. How many illegal aliens and deceased persons will be prevented from voting? Probably very few, since a photo ID and proof of citizenship is not required, thanks to too many Democrat-appointed judges.

  4. Let’s be honest, in part this hiccup is to attempt to prevent nonpartisan registrants (which by this article’s own admission is a larger group than registered Republicans) from voting for Republican candidates.

  5. > Dems Voice Concern Over Rule Excluding Voters From Primary

    “If their lips are moving, they’re lying”.

    “If they’re changing election rules, it’s an absolute certainty that they’re trying to game the system and lock in an advantage for the ruling oligarchy.”

    Democracy? What’s that?

Leave a Reply to SJ Kulak Cancel reply