San Jose Mayor’s Draft Budget Calls for $15Mil Rainy-Day Fund

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo rolled out a spending plan that would squirrel away $15.5 million to brace for a $42 million projected budget shortfall over the next four years. Setting aside money in the $3.5 billion budget in the coming months would prevent severe service cuts, according to his proposal unveiled Monday, just a few days after the city released its five-year fiscal forecast.

“With this budget message, we focus on our residents’ highest priorities: improving public safety, expanding affordable housing, confronting homelessness and restoring essential city services,” Liccardo said in a written statement. “With a looming deficit and a fragile financial future, however, we must consider new investments cautiously, with a predisposition to the long view.”

Thanks to cost-saving measures in recent years, the mayor said, the city should be able to close the deficit in 2018-19 and even make some new investments to address homelessness, domestic violence and blight.

Below are some of the one-time investments proposed by the mayor this year.

  • Homelessness: $3 million for various initiatives, including sleeping cabins, hotel and motel acquisitions and safe parking.
  • Litter cleanup: $125,000 to add two full-time staffers to pick up trash.
  • #BeautifySJ: $200,000 for community grants to beautify neighborhoods.
  • Dumpster days: $18,000 for each council district to fund dumpster days and other projects that improve the city’s aesthetics.
  • Domestic violence: $150,000 for a pilot program offering shelter to victims of abuse.
  • Tutoring: $250,000 to extend SJ Learns after-school tutoring into the summer months.
  • African American Community Services Agency: $250,000 to bring the facility up to code as the organization prepares to expand services to include First 5 child care programs and meals for the homeless.
  • Climate change: $100,000 to match grants that support the city’s ambitious new plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Civic service: $300,000 for Service Year, which offers paid fellowships for disadvantaged teens to work in the city’s libraries and parks and recreation programs.
  • Downtown ice rink: $100,000 to repair and upgrade the ice rink that’s one of the main attractions at San Jose’s annual Christmas in the Park fair.
  • Reserves: $2.5 million to set aside for essential services in lean budget years.

City Manager David Sykes’ latest fiscal forecast is slightly less pessimistic about future shortfalls than the one issued last spring, and even projects a $10.8 million surplus in the 2022-23 fiscal year because of lower-than-expected pension costs.

Source: City of San Jose

Though the city will save money on retirement costs because of a compromise deal it reached with labor unions in 2016, they still take up a greater share of the the budget with each passing year. In 2001-02, pensions cost San Jose $46.3 million and comprised 6.5 percent of the general fund. In the current fiscal year, they amounted to $301.4 million, or nearly 23 percent of the general fund.

Source: San Jose City Manager's Office

Sykes noted that property and business tax revenue is forecasted to grow in the year ahead, with business tax getting a big boost from cannabis collectives that can now sell to anyone over the age of 21. But revenue is down in a couple other categories, including a $5.1 million annual loss from the SAP Center based on the latest Sharks Sports Entertainment term sheet.

The City Council will vote on the mayor’s budget plan when it meets on March 20. Sykes’ office will then work the council’s directives into a draft spending plan for the 2018-19 fiscal year, which will be released on May 1 and come to a final vote in June.

For more information about the city budget, click here.

Jennifer Wadsworth is the news editor for San Jose Inside and Metro Newspaper. Email tips to [email protected] or follow her on Twitter at @jennwadsworth.

3 Comments

  1. So who gets to decide when and where these million dollar “rainy day” funds are spent? Appears to me like an illegal tax without voter consent. Maybe time for Liccardo to take a refresher course on our current taxation laws.

  2. why do we have to ‘pay’ for full time staffers to pick up litter? there are so many inmates & juvenials in lockup – why can’t they do it – hard work for possible lighter sentence? make them do something besides play basketball & lift weights.

  3. Part of the City’s budget savings this year is to only give employees a non-pensionable pay increase this year. However, Council has already voted to give themselves a 3% pensionable increase for 2017-2018. Will council revote to give themselves the same pay increase that they are giving their employees? Or will they continue to give themselves more? Hopefully they will do the right thing. Though it’s highly unlikely.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *