Report: Female Inmates Receive Limited Education Opportunities

Inmates who take classes in jail dramatically reduce their chances of re-incarceration. A 2013 study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Justice found that vocational and academic courses resulted in a 40-percent drop in recidivism, while each dollar spent on inmate education saved taxpayers $4 to $5.

But women behind bars in Santa Clara County are often prevented from signing up for classes because they’re classified as security risks. A Civil Grand Jury report issued over the summer charged local jail authorities of overstating those risks, and disproportionately limiting learning opportunities for female inmates. The Board of Supervisors will discuss the report when it meets Tuesday.

Elmwood Correctional Facility, which is run jointly by the Department of Corrections and the Sheriff’s Office, classifies inmates on a four-point scale. Of all women jailed at the Milpitas facility at the time of the grand jury investigation, 178 were considered low-risk (Level 1). Some 332 were considered moderate risk (Level 2 or 3), while 167 were labeled high risk (Level 4). The higher the risk, the fewer classes an inmate can take and the more confined they are to their cell.

“The inability of female inmates to take classes forces them to remain long hours within their cells or dormitories,” according to the report. “The grand jury was told by Elmwood staff that extensive physical confinement of the female population led to severe cases of depression and several attempted suicides. The depression can be so severe in some women that they are placed on a 24-hour watch unit where correction officers check the cells every 15 minutes to confirm their well-being.”

The grand jury advised the jail to expand course offerings for higher-risk inmates, or re-classify them to make them eligible for more classes.

Elmwood has repeatedly come under scrutiny for its gender gap in education. A civil grand jury report from a decade ago found that men could choose from 90 percent more classes than female inmates. Seven years later, another grand jury found that disparity persisted and said the jail should invest more in women’s vocational training.

Jail officials agreed with the 2012 findings that the inequity was a problem, but added that security classifications and a lack of physical space prevented them from closing the gap.

A year later, the DOJ-funded Rand study came out. The report determined that inmates who took part in correctional learning programs are 43 percent less likely to end up behind bars again. They also have a 13-percent greater chance of finding work once they’re out of jail.

But Elmwood’s educational programs are poorly managed, which prevents the jail from getting the most out of limited time and classroom space, according to the latest grand jury report.

Jurors said the simplest way to improve access for women would be to reclassify them as a lower security risk to qualify them for more classes. Prisons and jails across the nation have been grappling with the same problem, which has come into sharp relief as female incarceration has skyrocketed over the past two decades. Since 1985, female delinquency has increased year over year at double the rate for men.

Many of the women may have been misclassified in the first place because the jail relies on policies designed for male offenders. Jail staff told jurors that this lack of a gender responsive approach results in women being assigned a higher security classification than they warrant.

Chief of Correction John Hirokawa, who runs the jail, said the county has pegged $30,000 to pay for an outside expert to review the classification system.

Meanwhile, the jail should find a way to expand course offerings that would ready women to find work upon their release, the report suggested. Existing courses include landscaping, food prep, computer training, business and embroidery/silk screening. Because the average jail stay lasts less than a year, Elmwood only offers months-long vocational courses.

The grand jury's recommendations come amid a national push to ramp up corrective measures in so-called correctional systems. A new White House initiative will offer Pell Grants to state prison inmates to take college-level courses.

More from the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors agenda for August 25, 2015:

  • After a winter that was hardly a winter, Sunnyvale may have a new homeless shelter in time for cold weather this year. The county lost its 125-bed National Guard Armory shelter when Sunnyvale decided to convert it to low-income housing. While the county has yet to secure a permanent replacement, a temporary sprung tent stand-in will go up on the corner of Fair Oaks and California avenues in Sunnyvale. The 100-bed tent shelter will lie on a concrete base and house up to 100 people a night. It will cost $1.3 million, forcing the county to draw $857,000 from general fund reserves.
  • Two years ago, county social workers dropped more than 40 percent of calls to the region’s child abuse hotline. A scathing management audit prompted the Social Services Agency (SSA), which manages the phone bank, to hire more staff and revise the staffing schedule to have more people available during the busiest hours. A civil grand jury looked into the matter a year later, finding that other counties manage to take every single call. Jurors advised the SSA to make that the goal here, too. The call center has made considerable strides since then. From answering just 59 percent of calls in 2013, it picked up 79 percent in the second half of 2014 and 93 percent this year (including returned voicemails). The ultimate goal, of course, is to answer 100 percent of calls.

WHAT: Board of Supervisors meets
WHEN: 9am Tuesday
WHERE: County Government Center, 70 W. Hedding St., San Jose
INFO: Clerk of the Board, 408.299.5001

This post has been updated.

 

Jennifer Wadsworth is the news editor for San Jose Inside and Metro Silicon Valley. Email tips to [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter at @jennwadsworth.

12 Comments

  1. …simple cut education opportunities for males too. It’s Jail. The criminal element had many eduational opportunities during their formative years. Most squander the opportunity they had and we should stop squandering tax dollars to make up for their poor decisions.

  2. “Of the 500 female inmates at the Milpitas jail, 178 are considered low-risk (Level 1). Some 332 are considered moderate risk (Level 2 or 3), while 167 are labeled high risk (Level 4).”

    SJI please check your data and your math.

    178+332+167 = 677

    Not 500.

    • OK, we reviewed the report again and it looks like inmate numbers have fluctuated widely as a result of realignment. While the total number is about 500 right now, there were 670-plus at the time of the grand jury’s findings.

      Thanks for reading,

      JK

    • The cost of education is going up much faster than the cost of living:

      http://tiny.cc/8tkd2x

      That is because the gov’t keeps raising the amount students can borrow. Colleges and universities see that their students can afford more, so they raise the cost of tuition.

      It’s a vicious circle. And as usual, the government is at fault.

      Why is the government even involved in the education industry? At the local, state and federal level, government interference in this market has made thing worse, not better. As usual.

      • You nailed it.

        Also, the price of eggs has gone up. The price of housing has gone up. Water bills have gone up.

        Yet, the official spin meisters of the Obama regime, the New York TImes, and the academic and news media opinion oligarchy tells us . . .

        “There’s no inflation.”

        Someone’s lying.

  3. A water pipe in the county’s $75,000,000 crime lab has Legionnaires bacteria in it.
    Shouldn’t the crime labs first job be to find out who’s trying to poison them, and where is the water coming from?

    I might want to know that.

  4. The few educational opportunities for female inmates incarcerated in Elmwood is in stark contrast to the couple of dozen programs available to men incarcerated in Elmwood. However, it seems to have given Jenn’s poster child of this week enough time to have a fancy nail job done for her. The Rand study uses the term “correctional education”, which was undefined. Is that simple 3Rs or does it contain a component of correcting the inmates’ behavior, as well? I was not able to open the body of the report, just the summary, so I found no definition of that jargon term. Also, was the Rand report a study of just men, just women, or both? In any event the results of the Rand Report differ markedly from a report of a study of the various educational programs for men offered at Elmwood. That study found that men who one or more of these programs were re-arrested at a lower rate than those who took no programs at both 6 months and 12 months after release. However, that study also found that after 24 months, the re-arrest rate difference between those who took the programs and those who did not was statistically insignificant. In other words, there was no significant medium or long term reduction in recidivism from completing these much-vaunted programs for male inmates at Elmwood. Cousin Cortese’s solution seems a better one. Perhaps someone can get George Lopez or Cheech Marin to do a similar one in Spanish with Mexican actors, which would be more relevant to the Elmwood and SCC Main Jail populations.

  5. Glad to see the good men of the comment-sphere are weighing in with their usual thoughtful, pragmatic, cogent, and unbiased suggestions for how to solve the world’s woes, particularly as concerns women, at the local level.
    Had women only known that the ability to perform a manicure was equivalent to higher education they could have saved themselves the bother of such pesky little endeavors. Now if only the male contingent would learn such a skill perhaps their IQ’s would skyrocket as well.

%d bloggers like this: