Should California Community Colleges Build Housing?

Matthew Polamalu was spending 1.5 hours each day commuting back and forth to community college along Southern California’s congested freeways when he decided he’d had enough. He sat at his computer and Googled “community colleges with dorms.”

“I was just looking for the full college experience,” said the psychology major. He found it in a residence hall at Sierra College, along a winding, tree-lined road in the Sacramento suburb of Rocklin. There, Polamalu can easily stroll to the classroom next door for math tutoring, and no longer worries about competing with other students for parking spaces.

“I’m right near all the resources I need,” he said.

Think of a community college, and you’ll likely picture a commuter school with low-slung buildings and massive parking lots. And you’d be right—out of California’s 114 community colleges, only 11 offer on-campus housing. But some of those parking lots could soon become dormitories as community colleges look to build their own solutions to the state’s affordable housing crisis.

An 800-bed student apartment complex is rising on the campus of Orange Coast College, the largest community college in Orange County. At Santa Rosa Junior College, administrators kicked their plans for dorms into high gear after the Tubbs Fire swept through the wine country town in 2017, exacerbating its housing crunch. And the Los Angeles Community College District, where one student in five is homeless, is one of several districts studying the feasibility of building on-campus housing.

Largely built in rural areas in the 1960s, existing community college dorms were small, meant to serve students from far-flung towns who couldn’t easily commute. But skyrocketing housing costs have put new pressure on students, adding to demand. “Our thought was to have some housing on campus so our students can just concentrate on learning without worrying so much about, ‘Can I make rent?’ or ‘Where am I going to live?’ ” said Juan Gutierrez, public information officer for Orange Coast College.

Surveys showed the overwhelming majority of Orange Coast students was interested in living on campus, Gutierrez said. Half of the student body comes from outside Orange County, he said, with many avoiding the area’s steep cost of living by commuting from as far as San Diego or the Inland Empire. The project is set to open in the autumn of 2020.

At Sierra College, just over 100 students live in the no-frills residence hall with about twice as many on a waiting list to get in. Slots are set aside for athletes—most of whom come from outside the district—international students, and former foster care youth.

Students pay $925 per month to share a double or quad room, which includes a meal plan that they can use in the cafeteria and nearby off-campus restaurants.

The price was right for Polamalu’s friend Moe Irwin, a natural science major who is visually impaired and uses his disability benefits to pay rent. Cluttered with the typical college-student piles of clothes and books, the space he shares with a roommate is just big enough to fit the basics, plus a few dresses Irwin wears for drag performances.

“It’s mainly that we want independence from our parents,” Irwin said of himself and his dorm mates. “We love them, but we recognize it’s time to go out on our own.”

With rents in the Sacramento area rising, Irwin said, he would likely need to share a one-bedroom apartment with at least two other people if he wanted to live off-campus.

Finding Affordable Solutions

Community college students facing similar dilemmas without the option of on-campus housing are increasingly resorting to couch-surfing or living in their cars. As state lawmakers debate measures that would allow homeless students to park overnight on campus and provide them with housing vouchers, building dorms offers an alternate path, one that colleges can pursue on their own.

But it also means transforming the character of community college campuses and confronting thorny questions, such as how to make the units actually affordable to students. While Sierra College built, owns and manages its own residence hall, both Orange Coast College and Santa Rosa Junior College have opted for public-private partnerships with the Texas-based developer Servitas and Scion, a management and consulting company.

Rents for the Santa Rosa project will be under $800 per bed including utilities, or about six percent below market rate, said Pedro Avila, the school’s vice president of student services. He said the contract prohibits any rent increases without the college’s consent. Working with an experienced developer helped the college respond quickly after enrollment dropped in the wake of the wildfires, he said, as students unable to find housing began moving away.

“We were at the point where it didn’t matter that we were able to provide support or vouchers, people were getting pushed out of the area,” said Avila. “We’re trying to do our part and increase the number of units available to our students.”

Avila said he also hoped to find donors willing to subsidize rents for low-income students. Colleges can sometimes underestimate the extra expenses that come with building housing, said Sara Goldrick-Rab, a Temple University researcher who studies homelessness and food insecurity among students.

“With housing comes the need to build a whole bunch of other services. If you have students living on or around campus, they want campus dining to be open at different hours and they want libraries open at different hours,” she said. “It becomes a financial expense that is difficult for them to handle and ends up raising their prices even when they thought wouldn’t be doing that.”

Even a building with hundreds of beds might make only a small dent in the housing market on a campus with tens of thousands of students. Traditional dorm-style living doesn’t work for students with families of their own, and community colleges will need to decide which students get priority in applying for the rooms. “That’s probably going to be the most difficult conversation we haven’t had yet,” said Avila.

Community opposition can also derail a project. Last month, Ohlone College in the San Francisco Bay Area scrapped plans for a mixed-use housing development after neighbors complained that it would worsen traffic.

Colleges as Social Service Agencies

Despite the challenges, some advocates say providing housing is simply part of community colleges’ expanding mission.

With rampant income inequality darkening the prospects for many young Californians, they say, colleges must play the role of social service agency if they want to remove the obstacles that can prevent students from graduating. That’s the approach taken by Compton College president Keith Curry. The college recently updated its master plan to include 500 beds of student housing. It already provides free breakfast and lunch to students during finals week, and Curry is lobbying to create a free lunch program for community college students statewide.

“Our students are struggling; they need housing,” said Curry. “If we don’t do it, who’s going to do it for us? Who’s going to help the underserved? That’s our job.”

Early evidence from a project in Washington State indicates that solving community college students’ housing woes can help them graduate. Tacoma Community College partnered with the local housing authority to subsidize housing for students at risk of homelessness. After the first year, 95 percent of the students who got the assistance remained enrolled in college, according to the housing authority, compared with 24 percent of applicants on the waitlist.

Community colleges have advantages that other affordable housing developers don’t, said Dana Cuff, a professor of architecture and director of UCLA’s CityLab who is studying opportunities to build housing on Los Angeles Community College District campuses.

“Every community college has land, either on their existing surface parking lots or in the air above their temporary classrooms,” she said. “And secondly, the zoning restrictions that apply elsewhere don’t apply.”

The student housing of the future, she said, could include a range of options for different types of students—inexpensive hostels for super-commuters who only need to stay at school a few nights a week, supportive housing for homeless students, and cooperatives where residents reduce their housing costs by pitching in with cleaning and maintenance. Colleges can keep units affordable by developing their own expertise over time or working with non-profit developers, she said.

“Affordable housing isn’t an area where optimism reigns—it’s more like a battle,” she said. “But I feel positive that community colleges will make demonstration cases that others will learn from, and we’ll see a tipping point where community colleges will really see the advantages of providing housing for their students.”

This story and other higher education coverage are supported by the College Futures Foundation. is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.


  1. Education should not be a priviledge but a right. California and colleges have to create a plan to counter college students’ homelessness situation. SHAME ON California and its colleges. Only those with with resources to cheat on tests have an easy path to completing college. The rest have to try their best to secure food and housing while also passing classes to complete their degrees. Our education system ensures the success of the whealthy and the failure of the disadvantaged. LICCARDO should increase taxes on google and use these taxes to support local college students with housing challenge. This is goggle’s mess; GOOGLE MUST FIX IT!

  2. California taxpayers are soaked enough already with high taxes, a large portion which goes to education. And government is so inept and inefficient that it simply cannot compete with the private sector unless funded and subsidized by taxpayers. Take, for example, the absolutely disastrous performance of government’s involvement with and guarantee of student loans, which have such a poor payback record that government-guaranteed student loan debt defaults now exceed total consumer credit card deficiencies. Deplorable.

  3. Community college is for only 2 years period . It’s too short to move in and move out. Too much paperwork for a short time!

  4. “Education should not be a priviledge but a right.”

    Rights are enumerated in the Constitution. Education isn’t one of them.

    It seems that whatever someone wants without having to pay for it, they say it should be a ‘right’.

    What they really mean is that they should have the ‘right’ to confiscate another person’s income in order to pay for what they want, without having to work for it their own lazy self.

    Make the other guy go to work for you, is that it? But that’s legalized theft.

    It’s also indentured servitude, because you’re requiring another person to spend part of his or her life working for you, you lazy bum — just so you can have what you want, without working for it.

    But why should I have to work for you? Why should your wants come before my family? Got a credible answer?


    “Only those with with resources to cheat on tests have an easy path to completing college.”

    Huh? What does that mean?? And if it does mean anything, how does it follow from the preceding sentences? Or for that matter, from the subsequent sentences… ?

    Obviously, critical thinking is no longer being taught in the government’s dotEDU factories… just like they no longer teach American History, or Civics, or anything else citizens need to make intelligent decisions. The result is disjointed and confused thinking, leading to the idea that the world owes you a living.

    This country didn’t become immensely wealthy due to the policies of the Left, it got extremely rich because of its emphasis on individual liberty: the understanding that people will always work a lot harder for themselves and their families, than they will ever work for people they don’t know — which is the central premise supporting both Socialism and Communism.

    Karl Marx was a fool who knew nothing of human nature. But his political descendants knew plenty. They knew that envy is an ugly emotion — and that the envy of the masses can be stirred up very easily.

    That’s the motive behind the incessant demands that other people should have to work for what you want, no matter what it is. Just so it sounds good; that’s the key. Call it a ‘right,’ and you’re halfway home.

    Education? Yeah, I should have a ‘right’ to confiscate your earnings, since I want an education without having to pay for it. ‘That’s your job, chump.’

    Medical care? Yeah, I should have the ‘right’ to make you work extra hours to pay for my own doctor visits, because I have other things to spend my own money on. I’d rather make you spend your money on whatever I want. And education is my ‘right,’ see? So pay up, chumps!

    To paraphrase the erstwhile Mr. Rodgers: “Can you say ‘Spoiled brats?’ …I knew that you could!”

    *Sheesh!* Grow up already! This world isn’t all about pleasing you.

  5. Sorry if I sound dim here, but: aren’t community colleges for people who already live in the community? Isn’t the assumption that most of these people will be young people who are already living at home? And that’s why they’re often called ‘commuter’ colleges? I’m not saying there’s not a homelessness issue, but simply why on earth should the community college trustees be on the hook for their student’s housing? They’re schools, not shelters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *