Morgan Hill Denies Request for 2018 Police Shooting Records

Morgan Hill officials and free press advocates are at odds over whether video recordings and other records related to a 2018 officer-involved shooting should be made public.

In March, this news organization filed a California Public Records Act (CPRA) request with the city, seeking to review body camera footage of the April 29, 2018, incident involving MHPD Sgt. Bill Norman, who accidentally discharged his service weapon, striking a teen girl during a felony arrest. Also requested were personnel, administrative and other internal records related to Norman and his involvement in the 2018 shooting.

Morgan Hill police Chief David Swing and City Attorney Don Larkin replied that the city is not going to release the records, claiming they are exempt under the CPRA.

Larkin said the city has “always taken the position” that police body camera and dash camera videos are not subject to public release under the PRA—“unless there is a public benefit to releasing them.”

“(We) generally keep those confidential,” Larkin said.

He added that in the April 2018 incident, further complicating any potential release of videos is the fact that the subjects involved in the police call were juveniles. State laws prohibit law enforcement and other public agencies from identifying juveniles.

The city also denied a request for personnel, administrative and other internal records under Senate Bill 1421, a new provision to the PRA that just went into effect Jan. 1. The law opens internal police records related to investigations “involving the discharge of a firearm at a person by a peace officer” and “relating to an incident in which the use of force by a peace officer or custodial officer … resulted in death, or in great bodily injury.”

Larkin said in the April 2018 incident, Norman did not shoot his firearm “at a person,” as the bullet hit the ground near him before a piece of it bounced up and hit the 14-year-old girl. The city attorney added that the shooting did not result in death or great bodily injury, further exempting the records from release. An investigation report of the incident by the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office, which cleared Norman of any crime, said the girl was treated at a nearby hospital and released the next day.

According to Larkin, the incident in question “does not meet that definition (of great bodily injury) because she was treated and released.”

Attorneys for the injured teen, however, said in a claim filed against the city that the child suffered a “severe injury” due to the accidental shooting.

In justifying his denial of the request, Larkin said: “You don’t have an officer making a choice to use deadly force (in this case), and (he) didn’t intend to use any force at all.”

But an attorney for the California News Publishers Association said the city’s justification for denying the records requests is “inconsistent with the intent” of SB 1421.

“When you have a situation where the officer discharged their firearm and it injured someone, I think it’s hard to say that because their intent was not to shoot at the person, the records should not be disclosed,” said CNPA staff attorney Whitney Prout. She says the records of all officer-involved shootings, even accidental ones, and their related investigations should be open to the public.

“In a situation like this, when you have an officer who discharged a firearm, and injured someone, the public should know what happened,” Prout added. “The records should be open even if the officer did not act incorrectly.”

The April 2018 accidental shooting followed a high-speed pursuit to which several Morgan Hill police officers responded. The officers were trying to stop a stolen van that was driven by a 15-year-old boy. Two teen girls were passengers in the vehicle while it fled from police through town. The pursuit ultimately ended when an officer used his patrol car to cause the van to crash in the area of Llagas and Del Monte avenues.

Norman and other officers began to surround the van, which had destroyed a fire hydrant and streetlight pole, according to the DA’s investigation report. As the two girls walked slowly toward Norman with their hands up, Norman accidentally fired a round into the ground as he was holstering the weapon with his left hand. A fragment of the bullet bounced up and hit one of the teen girls in the eye.

Another new state law that amends the PRA—AB 748—will apply more clarity to the openness of police body cameras when it goes into effect July 1. This law will require police agencies to make officer body cameras available to the public after 45 days.


  1. My questions would be was the officer left handed and if so was the gun set up for a lefty. Depending on those answers you might have something to investigate.

  2. I urge the local Press to push to obtain record about police shootings and other police records not only from Morgan Hill Police but also Gilroy Police. There are some known spots in the Morgan Hill and Gilroy area to be known as places where female minors are sexually abused and then picked up by local grown men who engage in also sexually abusing them. There is a significant number of Commercially Sexually Explioted minors in the Bay Area. If the public knows about these spaces and parks; the police must know as well. The victim’s name and identity could be protected while continuing the investigation. The press should inquire not only on this case but in other cases as well. We cannot have safe communities if those with the duty to serve and protect are themselves engaging in illegal acts. MAKE POLICE ACCOUNTABLE!

  3. Thank you to news organizations pushing CPRA and to make SB 1421 work. The law, also known as the ” Right to Know” law, is a good one. People have a right to know if the police officers serving their community have a history of police misconduct, dishonesty or abuse. Non- profits play an important role in these requests as well. Last week Santa Clara University hosted First Amendment Coalition’s David Snyder and UC Berkeley’s Investigative Reporting Program’s John Temple who understood that if a police officer has a history of domestic violence or sexual harassment, crime victims have a right to know that information when calling police for protection. It is time to point out that police misconduct can only be deterred if prosecuted by a local district attorney.

    So far Santa Clara County’s DA Jeff Rosen has shown no interest in investigating, much less prosecuting, police officers, lawyers or judges who have engaged in misconduct. The best example of that is the 30 cases in Rosen’s office, and that doesn’t account for all the unreported abuse, or the taxpayer money Mr. Rosen has wasted as he ignored an employee he managed in the county’s Victim Witness Services who was engaged in an improper sexual relationship with an immigrant subordinate, resulting in two divorces, and a valid legal claim against the county. All while the DAO employee’s wife unsuccessfully tried to get protection from domestic violence herself. The DAO reportedly never did a background check before hiring this man to work in Victim Witness Services.

    #DDAJohnChase, #DDAGibbons-Shapiro, #DDAAllisonFilo, #DDASeiler, #MichaelRossi, #GretaHansen ,#DAJeffRosen #DDADavidAngel #TerryHarman #KaseyHalcon #SilviaMata #EddieGarcia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *