Santa Clara County Inmates Refuse Food to Protest Sheriff Laurie Smith’s Comments

After calling off a planned hunger strike last week, Santa Clara County inmates began refusing food anyway to protest comments by Sheriff Laurie Smith. Inmate advocates said the sheriff’s comments undermine verbal commitments by jail officials to improve jail conditions, including use of punitive isolation.

Smith’s comments were made to San Jose Inside in an Oct. 19 article about the scheduled hunger strike, which was set to begin this past weekend and which already began in Alameda County days before. Retired Undersheriff John Hirokawa, who’s running against Smith in 2018, criticized the way his former boss handled a hunger strike last year, accusing her of striking a deal with gang members in violation of county policy.

“Hirokawa is wrong,” Smith told San Jose Inside last week. “We are fixing his problems and he knows it. Further, we do not allow gangs to run the jails—and some of them could stand to lose a little weight. We will give their fresh food to the Salvation Army again. There are hungry people who committed no crimes and deserve a dinner.”

Jose Valle, a spokesman for Prisoners United, said those remarks flew in the face of good faith negotiations between his group and jail administrators. It took a few days for word to spread of the sheriff’s comments, but once Elmwood and the Main Jail inmates heard about the change in course, they began denying meals.

“All of this would have been definitely avoided if it weren’t for Laurie Smith’s comment,” said Valle, a former inmate who works for civil rights group Silicon Valley De-Bug. “What she said did three things. Number one, it was just flat out disrespectful and had no weight to it. Everything she said was non-factual. ... Secondly, it undermined efforts that were already made between jail administrators inside her organization. And third of all, it got officers to not comply with the agreement we set, so there were lockdowns and visitation cancelations and other retaliatory actions because of this.”

De-Bug director Raj Jayadev called Smith’s statement a “dog whistle” to rogue correctional deputies. Neither Smith nor her media officials responded to a follow-up request for comment.

Larry Lucero—an inmate awaiting trial in the biggest gang case in South Bay history who became a de facto spokesman for a five-day hunger strike in 2016—told San Jose Inside on Thursday that more people participated in this week’s protest than the one last year. But it’s a balancing act, he said, because inmates are trying to honor the jail’s command staff, which they feel negotiated in good faith, while demonstrating against Smith.

“I believe they, too, were blindsided by Laurie Smith,” Lucero said in a three-way phone call from the seventh floor of the Main Jail. He referenced the following points enumerated by Prisoners United in response to Smiths’ brief, inflammatory statement.

  • Upward of 70 percent of the county’s inmates are pretrial detainees.
  • Being in jail doesn’t necessarily mean someone is gang affiliated. According to a jail classification audit prepared for the county last year, the county jails hold only 21 verified prison gang members out of a custody population of about 3,600.
  • Prisoners United is a collective voice of inmates from all classification levels, color tops, racial groups and creeds.
  • The Salvation Army serves many formerly incarcerated clients.

Jayadev said Smith’s response belies the fact that Prisoners United accomplished something extraordinary leading up to last week.

“We had something that was historically rare, nationally rare,” he said. “You had an inmate coalition articulate a set of demands about changing systemic issues, and you had a jail administration that actually came to the table and met with community supporters and mutually resolved issues in a way that satisfied both parties.”

Those demands were to end arbitrary—as opposed to behavior-based—security classification, as well as to end group punishment, isolation, overly restrictive visitation and “cruel and unusual” penalties during out-of-cell time.

“And then,” Jayadev said, “Sheriff Smith, out of anger, destroyed all that goodwill effort by her own staff.”

Source: Prisoners United

Source: Prisoners United

Jennifer Wadsworth is a staff writer for San Jose Inside and Metro Newspaper. Email tips to jenniferw@metronews.com or follow her on Twitter at @jennwadsworth.

11 Comments

  1. They do know it’s jail don’t they? They aren’t there because they’re Boy Scouts. If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime.

    • It’s a jail, not a prison. The larger percentage is there awaiting their day in court. We do still live in the United States of America, right? I’m not so sure some days with so many people making comments that display a gross ignorance of what we and our Constitution stand for.

  2. Ironic Raj and De Bug had so much love for Laurie Smith. Raj & Crew even showed up at the BRC hearings to support Smith. Now do you believe the deputies when they say Laurie couldn’t care less about inmates, public safety, or virtually anything beyond making sure her public image hides the private image that you are undoubtedly well aware of both now, and likely back in 2014 as well?

  3. They may be pre-trial detainees, but you can bet almost all are guilty; they just haven’t plead or gone to trial to have it proven. If they don’t want to eat, fine. I’m sure there are plenty of people on the outside who would be glad to have the food.

Leave a Reply to SJ Kulak Cancel reply